Main Content

Ambassador or Anorak?

Archive - Originally posted on "The Horse's Mouth" - 2010-08-03 17:29:56 - Graham Ellis

Belatedly from the weekend, I've been going through a whole load of pictures taken for "library use" in rail campaigning ... and it had me musing as to the way that rail enthusiasts seem to be far more concerned with the types of trains and stock operation rather than the suitability of service. It also had me musing, rather sadly, that there's a fine body of mostly-men who know so much about the railways and should be welcomed as their ambassadors, but are all too often marginalized under the term "anoraks".

Well - I'm no actually wearing a rain-proof anorak, so I suppose I'm not completely in that category - but then I was hardly in ambassadorial dress either. OK - I was taking the dog out for a walk and it happened to be at a destination reached by train.


There's a great beauty in the geometry of rail - lines and angles - as with this Saturday picture; have a look at more pictures [here]. But even when looking at pictures, I seem to end up drawing stories and parallels - comparing a town of 10,000 people with a train every hour with a town of 22,000 with two trains a day ... looking at how a train can replace 6 buses, which in turn can replace 20 cars and how much better that is for efficient transport ... and so on