Planning the future of Wiltshire
Archive - Originally posted on "The Horse's Mouth" - 2009-11-07 08:08:36 - Graham EllisBackground to planning the future - the mechanism
Where will Wiltshire be in 20 years time? Will it grow, and if so how - will development all go into 2 or 3 major towns, leaving smaller towns to loose their significance and hearts? Will development spring up all over the place, or in a new town as I suggested (tongue in cheek) a couple of years ago in Bratton and Edington New Town. And if housing grows, will businesses, schools, shops, leisure medical facilities grow alongside, or will those be centralized giving need to increased travel and transport needs. Will such extra facilities be underdeveloped, leading to a worsening of services, or thought through ahead of time so that they're on stream when needed? And will the character of our towns and city, and our villages and countryside, be retained ... or will we become just like every other set of towns and cities across the land with individuality stifled? And how will all this effect carbon footprint / global warming / sustainability / quality of life?
The Regional Spatial Strategy has laid down the broad brush strokes of development for the next 20 years, and that provides for major grown West of Swindon, and in North and West Wiltshire. And now Wiltshire Council is starting to put flesh onto those bones, looking further as to where the growth that is planned will go in this area. There's a consultation on the Core Strategy going on at the moment - some documents were published for public comment on 31st October, and there are public displays in most towns over the next month, at which the public are invited to look at posters and make comment. In each town, a forum to discuss the plans is held in the evening after the meeting, and full consultation inputs are to be made by 5 p.m. on 31st December.
The core strategy will be drawn up more closely next year, comment will be invited as to whether the process has been fair, and a government inspector will then look at the plans and hold a formal public hearing into them prior to the strategy being adopted.
Does it matter what the strategy says and how it is arranged?
Yes, it does - very much. The draft strategy calls for ...
A "significant level of economic and housing development where higher order facilities and services exist" in Chippenham, Trowbridge, and the area to the West of Swindon.
"Sufficient new development to consolidate and develop their service role" in Market tows (their spelling mistake!) which are listed as Calne, Corsham, Devizes, Malmesbury, Marlborough, Melksham, Tidworth/Ludgershall, Warminster, Westbury and Wootton Bassett
"Development only to support their existing service centre role for a rural hinterland" for smaller towns and larger villages (no list given)
"Development restricted to accommodate the local housing need" for small villages.
Looking at their "Market Town" strategy, the plans read very much as if the spatial planners see their futures as dormitory settlements, with jobs and facilities going in to Chippenham, Trowbridge, West-of-Swindon. That may suit some of the town - but it does not suit what the people of Melksham want. How can I be so sure? Because the spatial planners recently suggested that the new Countrywide store be built in Chippenham or Trowbridge, rather than in Melksham - moving some 35 to 40 jobs from the town; everyone objected, and the vote that's been running on the Chamber of Commerce Web Site has - as I speak - attracted 50 votes to have the new Countrywide store in Melksham and just one to send Countrywide packing.
If we don't want to have to fight the strategic developers for every single employment opportunity - every chance of improved local shopping, transport and parking - every chance of facilities for our young people to have something to do of an evening other than a pub crawl ... then we should make strong inputs into the process at this stage and we should continue to do so. The current size and setup of Marlborough, Malmesbury and Melksham are radically different, and their futures should be very different too. The planner's ideas might be right in line with the Marlborough folks - but they are out of step with Melksham and we should not all be lumped together.
Where do we go from here
The core strategy consultation tour display comes to Melksham on 26th November and (uniquely) will be in a mobile unit in the Town Centre - initial feedback when I asked "where in the town" is "Outside Peacocks". I will be attending, and I suggest that others do too.
The display, which is open to the general public, is followed by a consultation discussion / forum for invited community group representatives only. And (based on experience and talking with people when I went up to Chippenham last night), invitations are very tightly drawn ... I gave my details to a Wiltshire Council Officer who told me that I should attend the public display and add post-it notes onto the displays. It's unlikely that I'll get an invite, as they were looking for community representatives who would make positive inputs (a.k.a. rubber stamp their plan?) rather than people who run/represent businesses in the area. In the car park outside, Lisa and I met up with one of the prospective MPs on his way in. He's been selected by a major political party and has a good chance of winning the Chippenham seat, but I understand that even he was told that the display, and not the forum, was the place for him. I wonder if they relented and allowed him an input [Update - I understand he WAS admitted] - I would certainly welcome inputs from all of our candidates for MP on the subject of Melksham's future. I will be asking for a formal invite to the discussion and I suggest that others do so too
The Grand Kingdom of Wiltshire
We watched a video about the plans and process, and I was struck by the words of Andrew Cunningham, of Wiltshire Council. "We want to control the development ..."
Ah. He's given the game away.
It shouldn't be a question of controlling. It should be a question of helping and facilitating development, surely. Of generating the right conditions for new housing, businesses, leisure facilities, etc, to be built in logical places and to preserve the history and environment and to improve the quality of life. So - if you like - he and his officers should be making it easier for things to move forward in the way that fits what the people of the county want, and not trying to impose planning decisions and policies to manipulate developments so that they are lords and masters of the Kingdom of Wiltshire.
Footnote
This displays on show in Chippenham are "not yet on line" though much of the core strategy stuff is - links to that here - and there were no copies to take away, So we, the public, were limited at this stage to reading what was on the wall and commenting without taking it away and giving it further thought, and I can't reproduced too much detailed text here without transposing it from pictures I took. You'll see from the picture here that the opportunity to add anonymous comments was being taken up and there is a more serious ability to make inputs via forms / emailSome of the "postit" views ...
You talk about sustainable transport here. Yet the only transport change you actually show is a link road. This is hardly sustainable.
What confidence can we have in this proposal when Market Towns is spelt "Tows"
Your total for Chippenham doesn't add up
Difficult to comment as no specific information
Why are we taking waste to South Wales
I'll reserve my comments for the Melksham road show, and for when I have listened a bit more
• [link] to forum page on this topic